Is Is a Flat World free essay sample

Freidman summarizes the three globalizations that have occurred in the world. The first one in 1492-1800, making the world to a medium size. Second one in 1800 to 2000 making the world to a size small and third one starting in 2000 making the world flat after all these years of developing technology causing to become an integrate and flat world. Freidman’s 10 events and forces starting in Nov. 9, 1989 with Berlin Wall’s falling down mention how the world get flattened so fast. He mentions in these 10 events the Netscape moment offering the dot-com and connecting people in a way never before. This enable Indian engineers which years back when the world wasn’t globalized didn’t had the opportunity to compete in a position with an American to be enlisted for outsourcing. With these events the world suddenly began outsourcing, offshoring, open-sourcing, insourcing, supply-chaining and informing people and connecting them, showing the world a whole new idea: that we are living in a globalize world. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Is a Flat World? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The final event he called it â€Å"the steroids† which is the wireless access that enables you to connect with every person you want from anywhere with any device. Which is contrary to what Ghemawat says, â€Å"People are getting more connected but they aren’t connecting† (pg. 58 Ghemawat, 2005). The fact is that people are spending time chatting with family and friends that meeting someone to start a flat world. It is true that not everyone has the access to technology, but is a fact that each day more people get connected and collaborating to this than ever before in history’s life, this is the first step for a globalize world. Americans had become lazier in innovating probably because they never thought that globalization would be knocking in their front doors. â€Å"This is not a test† Freidman says, is already happening and the soonest you prepare for this the soonest you will be part of this flattened world. â€Å"Why the World Isn’t Flat† by Pankaj Ghemawat is just the opposite as everything Freidman tells, making an exaggeration to all this presumption of the world being flat. In the article he states facts proving we are far away from a fully globalized world. He evidences this by stating, â€Å"90% of all phone calls, web traffic and investment is global. † Freidman’s 10 forces seem persuasive but Ghemawat’s The 10 Percent Presumption proved him wrong. In these presumptions it shows that immigration, phone calls, direct investment, and others don’t even exceed the 10% in levels of internationalization across industries. Patents and portfolio investment barely exceeds the 10% and trade hardly beats the 20%. Even with trades being the highest you cannot have a globalize world with that percentage shown. For Ghemawat all of this flat world that Freidman says contains an exaggeration maybe in order to sell books and that we in fact are more cautious and prefer to be in a protectionism world. Although major revolutions as the Internet has improved the way we globally integrate, the barrier where globalization’s principles: language, geography and distance doesn’t matter is still not functioning at all. Russia’s local service Yandex beating up Google because they don’t have the ability to understand the complexities of the Russian language proves that we are not living in a globalize world. He also states that there is a fear of becoming a globalize world as tendency is supporting more protectionism and â€Å"that globalization may be incompatible† While Freidman’s posture is mentioning that a flat world involves everyone around, as a video-conference with the entire supply chain of the company and different employees all at once. You need to leave protectionism and a fear of being globalized and knowing you’re in a flat world when your office has eight different clocks. Ghemawat mentions that people like Friedman are describing globalization, as a world that doesn’t exists. The truth is for Freidman that people don’t know but we are actually living a globalization that is shown by stating a fact that China graduates twice students with bachelor’s degree than US. â€Å"America is falling behind† he says, but the truth is that everyone is falling behind if they don’t realize that the world is becoming more flat and less round. â€Å"The World is Spiky† by Richard Florida mentions that the world is more harrowing and less flat as Freidman says. He refers spiky with a map as the different peaks around the world and how they aren’t constant but significantly diverse that you cannot call it a flat world as Freidman. There had been a growth in countries with the major cities but they are leaving their other cities behind this process of globalization. Florida says this spiky globalization in big countries like China are concentrated their production, innovation in their rural regions leaving the urban outside of this making them have conflicts. Instead of a flatter world is becoming a spiky world with peaks dispersed all around it but in an inconsistent way. Instead of raising spikes, there needs to be valleys to have equality in their peaks for a flat world to come and he’s arguing why Freidman left this gap between the poor and rich behind. Also the article by Matt Taibbi â€Å"Flathead† for the New York Press, says he is not surprised about what Freidman says because he always continues to fail his metaphors in this case the world being flat. Arguing in favor of the exaggerations Ghemawat said about Freidman and the harrowing the world is as Florida. I believe that Freidman exaggerated of the world being flat but also I believe this is just what we need in order to have a motivation and not getting stuck in the laziness and comfort. Maybe this fear of globalization people have, is because they know that they’re living in a globalize world where they can be left behind if they don’t realize the fact that today the world is becoming more flat and less round or spiky.

Mary Ainsworth Essay Example

Mary Ainsworth Essay Example Mary Ainsworth Essay Mary Ainsworth Essay Mary Ainsworth a Prominent Woman of Psychology PSY/310 October 30, 2010 Mary Ainsworth a Prominent Woman of Psychology Mary D. Salter- Ainsworth was born in Glendale, Ohio in December of 1913. Her parents were both academics at Dickenson College. Her father majored in history, while Mary’s mother focused on teaching and nursing. According to her biography, Mary and her two sisters grew up in a very â€Å"close-knit family† (Ainsworth, 1983). The importance of education was definitely impressed upon the girls at an early age, and weekly trips to the library were a regular event. In 1918, when Mary was just five years old, Mary’s father received a job in Toronto and moved his entire family to Canada. As a teenager, Mary read William McDougall’s book, Character and the Conduct of Life. This insightful book spurred the idea in Mary that one could look into one’s self for explanation, and she became enthralled with the study of psychology. At the age of sixteen Mary enrolled into the honors psychology program at the University of Toronto. Mary would go onto earning her Masters and PhD in developmental psychology, all from the University of Toronto. Mary taught at the university for three years before enlisting in the Canadian Army in 1945, where she eventually became a Major. Mary spent four years in the Army working for the personnel placement department. Ainsworth would get her first taste of clinical psychology there, which changed her perspective of it and would also change her carrier direction post WWII. After her four year military tour, Ainsworth went back to Toronto to resume teaching psychology. Ainsworth wanted to figure out a way of splitting up personality psychology with a professor that already had the position, and was turned onto the assessment of personality. Not confident in her own knowledge of the subject material, Ainsworth attended a summer course on Rorschach technique. Ainsworth immersed herself deeply into projective and paper pencil tests, in order to comfortably instruct her knew courses, and this is how Ainsworth became involved in clinical psychology. Mary would again attend courses on Rorschach technique and eventually write a manual and co-author a book on the technique, with Bruno Klopfer. In 1950 Mary met Leonard Ainsworth a fellow academic at the University of Toronto, and would soon be engaged to be married. Finished with his masters and not yet completed with his Doctorate, this meant Leonard would be a student in the same depart Mary held a chair position in. Mary felt that this would be a difficult situation for the both of them, but Leonard received news that he was accepted to the University College in London and they made the move. Both Mary and Leonard had difficulties locating work in London and eventually a Military friend of Mary’s would turn her onto a job listing for a research position at Tavistock Clinic. This is where Ainsworth would begin her research on early development, and meet Dr. John Bowlby, a psychologist researching in that field. Bowlby had already begun his work in developing his attachment theory, and needed help with observation and experimentation. Ainsworth and Bowlby would begin a long fruitful journey together exploring the realm of attachment syndromes. In 1954 Mary’s husband John finished his Ph. D. and received an appointment to East African Institute of Social Research in Kampala, Uganda. Not excited about the move Mary followed her husband to Africa and began her own studies there. She developed a short- term longitudinal, naturalistic study of mother and child interaction. Mary was unable to secure funding for the testing prior to leaving London, but found Dr. Audrey Richards, an anthropologist in Kampala, was more than willing to fund her experiments. Mary states in her biography, that she was convinced that it was far easier to be objective when observing situations outside of a familiar culture. She would later recant that statement and discuss that it was much easier to do such within her own culture (Ainsworth 1983). At the end of Leonard’s two year study in Africa, both the doctors were looking for positions again in either Canada or America. Jobs were still a little difficult to find and Leonard wound up locating a job in Baltimore as a forensic psychologist. Shortly thereafter the Dean at John Hopkins contacted Mary about a position as a clinical-type instructor, which John Hopkins’ psychology department at that point was primarily an experimental type setting. Ainsworth also found herself working at Sheppard and Pratt Hospital as clinical diagnostician. She really liked the work at the hospital, despite remarks that it was a position below her abilities. In 1960 Leonard and Mary were divorced and Mary fell into a slight bout of depression. She began to receive psychoanalytic therapy, which led to another discovery of interest. Ainsworth began to immerse herself into the psychoanalysis realm of psychology, researching Freud’s work among others. Ainsworth was quoted in saying that, â€Å"I believe that this was the most important positive influence on my career, despite the fact that I had already been very fortunate in both mentors and turns of fortune. Certainly analysis helped me to become very much more at peace with myself and very much more productive† (Ainsworth 1983). Ainsworth emerged with a new found respect for the analytical discipline of psychology, and wanted to continue her research in mother-infant interactions, that she began in Africa. The work load between John Hopkins and Sheppard-Pratt hospital was too immense for Ainsworth to really complete any research and she opted to discontinue her work at the hospital and focus on her mother-infant interaction research. John Hopkins faculty was on board with this change and very supportive, after a short issue with gender discrimination. Ainsworth’s research utilized both non-interactive observations within the home and special lab environments. Ainsworth set up her in-home observations at three week intervals from three to 54 weeks after birth and each visit lasted four hours. This gave Ainsworth a huge amount of data on each mother-infant pair, about 72 hours of observation time each. The long frequent visits also allowed the pair to enter into their normal day-to-day routines. Another key benefit from long frequent visits was that if there were any abnormal behavior, due to any reason that could be factored into the equation and averaged out. Another research method Ainsworth used was her specially setup rooms that had toys to keep children occupied and chairs that gave the room a living room feel. The experiment was setup so that Ainsworth could monitor children’s reactions when the mother left and then returned again. This was carried out in a series of patterns. From watching the children’s reactions she made several discoveries. She noticed that depending on the level of interaction the mother had with their child was directly correlated with the child’s reactions one while mother was absent and two upon the mothers return. The mothers’ that were more in touch with their infants cues, produced children that were secure-attached. Secure-Attachment is where a child is secure to explore the room even in the presence of a stranger, but upon the departure of their mother, the child becomes agitated and confused. When the mother returns the child feels comfortable to explore the new room again. Another category that Ainsworth discovered is anxious-resistant insecure attachment. Anxious-resistant children often are anxious around strangers even with the mother present. If the mother leaves the child becomes extremely distraught and even resents attention upon the caregivers return. The third stage Ainsworth noticed was anxious-avoidant insecure attachment, this child set would not care who was present mother or stranger. The child displayed emotional detachment, and represents a disengaged relationship with their caregiver. A fourth stage was later added by Ainsworth’s colleague, Mary Main. This stage was dubbed disorganized-disoriented attachment, and children that fell into this category often had mothers that fell into a depression for one reason or another. The child’s reaction upon the caregiver leaving was to cry a little, but upon return, the child would freeze and fall to the floor. When both caregiver and stranger are present the child would exhibit some confusion, and be slightly upset. With these categories set by the â€Å"Strange Situation† experiments many people have been able to further develop the relationship between mother and child. Huge amounts of tedious delicate research went into Ainsworth’s studies and some say we have not seen such thoroughness sense. Before her death in 1999, Mary Ainsworth received many awards and accommodations from the APA and educational institutions. Ainsworth was awarded the G. Stanley Hall award by APA in 1984 for developmental psychology, and also received another award for professional contribution to knowledge, by the APA in 1987. The APA granted her more recognition in 1989 for distinguished scientific contributions. In 1998 one year before she passed the American Psychological Foundation awarded her with the gold medal for Scientific Achievement. Mary Ainsworth was granted Professor Emeritus at the University of Virginia from the years 1984 to 1999. References Stony Brook University. (2010). Psychology Department. Retrieved from  http://psychology. psy. sunysb. edu/psychology/ Bretherton, I. (2010).

Aspects of British Culture

Aspects of British Culture Aspects of British Culture What is culture? Is it the language we speak, overall ethnicity in a region, or the simple customs of a daily routine? Culture is something we are all a part of whether we like it or not. Your family may have certain customs and routines. This is culture. In this research paper I will be analyzing British culture in four categories: history, ethnicity, customs, and also the future direction of British Culture. How did Britain become so rich in culture? Well Britain certainly did not just appear one day. The name of the country and the term â€Å"English† derive from the Old English word for one of the three Germanic Peoples that invaded the British Isles in the 5 th century (Countries and Their Cultures). The Angles â€Å"Britain† and â€Å"British† derive from a Roman Term for the inhabitants (Countries and Their Cultures). In fact, written records of British History do not exist until the arrival of the Romans (J.P. Dommerville). Be fore the arrival of the Romans, there is only archaeological evidence of Britain’s inhabitants (J.P. Sommerville). The earliest inhabitants of Britain for whom there is compelling evidence are bands of hunters living in Southern and Western England during the Hoxnian (J.P. Sommerville). Many peoples make up the rich history of British Culture. There were many immigrants that came to found The United Kingdom. Their genes still walk the grounds today. Just like America this country was founded, and made by immigrants from many different backgrounds. Like many cultures, there are different peoples whom make up the general ethnicity. British Culture is no exception to this understanding. Britain or the U.K. known to others is located in Western Europe, islands including the northern one-sixth of the island of Ireland between the North Atlantic Ocean, and the North Sea, northwest of France (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The capital of the United Kingdom is London (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The population is roughly 60, 766, 238 people; with an ethnic make-up of White, Black, Indian, Pakistani, Mixed, and Other (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The White Population is composed of: 83.6% English, 8.6% Scottish, 4.9% Welsh, and 2.9% Northern Irish (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The other ethnic populations are composed of: 2% Black, 1.8% Indian, 1.3% Pakistani, 1.2% Mixed, and 1.6% Other (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). As you can see, all of these different ethnicities will definitely impact culture. So what customs will follow this diverse cultural background? Many people may assume that British Culture is defined with scones and tea, or the rich writings of Shakespeare; however it is not like this at all. There are many customs that British people practice, that Americans or any other type of nationality may find odd. Many customs are a ssociated with the annual climate, and British Culture is once again no exception. The annual climate of the United Kingdom has temperatures that are moderated by southwest winds over the North Atlantic Current, and more than one-half of the days are overcast (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The U.K. is also home to a constitutional monarchy (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). Although there is no defined official language due to the diverse cultural background, the primary language is English (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). About 70% of the population speaks English (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). Other languages that are frequently spoken include: Welsh, Irish, Ulster Scots, Cornish, Gaelic, and British Sign Language (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The United Kingdom is comprised of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). Now all of these countries share a common thing, and that is to address a person from a country properly. For instance, English and British do not mean the same thing (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The term â€Å"British†, denotes someone who is from England, Scotland, Wales, or Northern Ireland (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). The term â€Å"English†, refers to people from England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette). People from different countries want to be known for what they are; another example is people from Scotland are identified as â€Å"Scots†. People from Wales are identified as â€Å"Welsh†. People from Northern Ireland are identified as â€Å"Irish† (UK – Language, Culture, Customs and Etiquette).

Position Statement (outline) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Position Statement (outline) - Essay Example A single expense such as house rent is capable of taking up almost half of one’s salary. Businesses can also abuse the work-market since minimum wages ensure that businesses give their employees a reasonable sum of money to pay the bills, whether one is skilled or unskilled. Minimum wage, finally, forces businesses to share their vast wealth with the producers of the wealth. Some executives take millions home in bonuses even when a company posts a loss. Therefore, it is not much to ask that they give the employee at least a guaranteed set pay. a) Economics’ most fundamental principle is demand and supply and, in the case of labor, supply of workers normally goes up with the appreciation of wages, with the demand for workers going down with an appreciation in wages. An employer backed, into a corner, to pay a certain amount of money to a janitor by the government might decide not to employ a janitor, instead making the other employees pick up the janitor’s duties. b) Setting a mandatory wage limit causes a disruption of the demand and supply market forces (Neumark & William 13). As the minimum wages rise, the number of people in employment drops and vice versa. It is fundamental to remember that minimum wages will only apply if an individual is employed. c) Many businesses such as automakers have mundane tasks that can be performed by machines. Forcing them to institute a minimum wage structure will lead to increased mechanization. Spending up-front money for this mechanization seems a fair price to pay compared to paying set wages that exclude the rules supply and demand. a) Outsourcing of jobs eventually leads to a reduction in the number of jobs accessible to the citizens. An increase in labor costs, say in the United States, will lead to the creation of an added incentive to hire labor from Canada and Mexico. b) Companies facing rising labor costs, further, experience more

Team Communication and Problem Solving Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Team Communication and Problem Solving - Essay Example al. 1999 and Mabey et. al., 1998, amongst others) as decision makers are unable to be objective and rational in the real world. The 'administrative' or 'bureaucratic' model "questions whether managers are capable of making rational decisions" (Fulop & Lindstead, 1999. p. 299) and bases decision making on the actual behavior of the decision-maker. Simon (1960, in Fulop & Lindstead, 1999:308) recognises cognitive limits to human rationality and that "the decision making is likely to be influenced by non-rational, emotive and unconscious elements in human thinking". Incomplete information, time limits and group pressures are "thought to limit the optimising behavior so central to the rational model" (op. cite.). As a result, decision-making is the product of 'bounded rationality' and 'disjointed incrementalism', which results in 'satisficing', where the best decision is made within the confines of imperfect information and 'mutual partisan adjustment' between parties. In the 'bureaucratic' model this process is then institutionalised for future problem solving. The 'garbage-can' model suggests that "decisions are really problems looking for solutions" (Fulop & Lindstead, 1999:299), emphasises both the "role of chance decisions and the concept of strategy as a stream of decisions" (Leonard, et. al.

Love Cant Be Simply Put :: essays research papers

The famous Benjamin Franklin once said, "If you would be loved, love and be lovable." But what is love, it can be defined by the Webster's dictionary as a "profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person." Even with that just being said countless poets, philosophers, and authors have fallen short of truly capturing the full meaning of love. The reason could lie in the differences of love and its ability to change throughout our lives. When a baby is born and placed into the hands of loving parents, the love that the baby is able to get is vital in the development of it. The love or lack of love starts to change you from the beginning of your life and continues throughout adulthood. The young baby needs the love and wants the attention. It needs to be protected and cared for. Undoubtedly there is a major love for a baby and the love of the baby for the mother. Interestingly some people say that they love chocolate, basketball, sex, and even cars. But that doesn't fall into the Webster's definition of being "profoundly tender, passionate affection for another person." Also it doesn't agree with Benjamin Franklin's, "If you would be loved, love and be lovable." As everyone knows the game of basketball is not a person and it can't love you back. So why would someone say that they love those things? I know from my own experiences that I have a passionate affection for playing the game and I feel a joy in playing it. Continuing to blur the meaning of love with it's diversity in the relationships we have for people and objects. For instance, I love my mom, dad, brothers, dog, sports, and many more. During certain periods of my life the love will certainly rise or fade. Also the intensity of that love is not the same in all those relationships. For I have never been in love with a girl, I may only imagine what it might be like to be in love. Guessing from my friends relationships with other girls it seems like a big headache instead of wonderful bliss like some poets maybe would like to put it. When Benjamin Franklin said, "If you would be loved, love and be lovable," he must have meant that love goes both ways. That not only is it important to love but also important in how it is received.

Analysis of Chopin’s use of linguistic features in her literary works

From the Victorian era, Chopin startled critics with her paradigmatic tale of a woman’s abortive struggle towards independence in an oppressive society. By using women as her protagonist, Chopin highlights their sexist roles in literature whilst restricting them from the expansion necessary to deal with their realisation. It thus seemed conducive to transform the novel into a series of letters in the form of English Sonnets, establishing the undeveloped characterisation of Edna with Robert, whilst they are separated from each other. The transformation aims to elucidate Edna’s role in society, by satirizing the narrow and stereotypical way in which woman are commonly portrayed in literature. The novel as a form does not offer the opportunity for character development in the same way a series of letters/sonnets do. For example, Edna openly declares her love for Robert, at the time of her death: â€Å"I’m the person who deserves your love.† The continuous sense of the author’s evaluation of the moral choices that her characters make is lost; they seem more autonomous throughout the sonnets because they speak for themselves without Chopin’s explicit authorial presence. The sonnet form successfully mimics letter writing as both forms are addressed to someone, whilst informing and shedding light on their own thoughts. Moreover, when the two characters reveal their feelings to each other or reminisce of their time together at Grand Isle, the meter is tight, mirroring the natural sound of a heart beating. For example, Robert declares: â€Å"The bonds we made grew deeper than the sea.† This foreshadows events, making it clear to the reader the context of which the letter/sonnets are written, in the novel. As the final sonnet concludes, the iambic pentameter in the rhyming couplets deliberately fails, creating the sound of a dying and irregular heartbeat, phonetically indicating Edna’s death. Both lines thirteen and fourteen consist of eleven syllables, breaking the strict rule of including five iambs with one unstressed and stressed syllable, to make up the meter. Unlike the rest of the sonnets, the final is in past tense which suggests that she has already died and is looking back on her words to Robert. The fact that she dies simultaneously as the sonnet concludes, highlights the end of their communication and hence concludes the transformation through her tragic death. Phallogocentrism is a key attitude conveyed in Robert’s sonnets, particularly after he discovers that Edna only likes him to gain attention from her husband, whom she believes to be having an affair. For example, conventional values of gender roles are implied through this simile: â€Å"like a deceived husband not knowing you,† which aims to make Edna feel sympathy towards her husband, in an attempt to reduce her emotional desire for Robert, which contrastingly accentuates through the discourse of the transformation. In conclusion, the third sonnet uses juxtaposition of Edna’s beauty to highlight her cunning and manipulative ways as a female protagonist. This is revealed through the line: â€Å"For there can live no hatred on your face,† which highlights Edna’s surfaced, innocent faà §ade, concealing her inner desires, highlighting her non feminist attitude.