Aaron Beam and the Health South Fraud Essay

Concerning the Aaron Beam and the HealthSouth Fraud case in our content Velasquez (2012), the accompanying inquiries from the content and my responses to these inquiries are given as mentioned. 1. Which of the â€Å"obstacles to moral conduct do you see at work in Aaron Beam’s conduct and thinking? In Scrushy’s? The impediments I find in Aaron Beam’s conduct are â€Å"Rationalizing Our Actions and Displacement of Responsibility†. Justifying his activities is upheld by remarks he made regarding the activities he had or was going to take in supporting his boss. Aaron Beam expressed in Velasquez (2012), â€Å"He depicted the transition to himself as forceful bookkeeping yet certainly not fraudulent† (p 68). In the persistent cooking of the books, each time Beam was press or coordinated by Scrushy to do as such. Aaron Beam perhaps believes that to be his escape prison free card, by pointing the finger back at his boss, as relocation of his obligation. We see obviously what he was thinking in Velasquez (2012), as he â€Å"felt it was actually inside the limits of bookkeeping rules and financial specialists would be sufficiently advanced to comprehend what was happening† (page 68). This would identify with â€Å"Biased Theories about Others†, as he accepted this gathering of financial specialists was refined. You can't resist the opportunity to think he additionally felt furtively an investor(s) would scrutinize their activities and carry them to represent their activities considering the circumstance he was in with his boss. The snags I see in Richard Scrushy’s conduct are â€Å"Disregarding or Distorting Harm, Euphemistic Labeling, and Rationalizing Our Actions†. Concerning â€Å"Disregarding or Distorting Harm† dependent on the conviction he was doing something worth being thankful for by giving recovery treatment to patients at lower costs than ordinary emergency clinics, one could derive he di scovered taking the necessary steps to succeed he would do, all on the backs of his representatives, of which as CEO he could dishonor freely. We could likewise, thusly consider â€Å"Euphemistic Labeling† as he was not above lying as deciphered by the different money related reports delivered to make the organization look increasingly productive under the cloak of just business. He himself would feel pressure in 1996 as they couldn't meet second quarter projections. He would indeed ask Aaron Beam to cook the books, or the organization would confront monetary ruin. Scrushy excuses this away by saying in Velasquez, (2012), â€Å"If they could simply overcome the quarter, at that point everything would be okay† (p 69). We see unmistakably what he was thinking as up to this point he felt everything was going his direction; only once again let the bones roll. This would identify with â€Å"Biased Theories about Oneself†, as he is positive about his capacities, so what irregular occasion might he be able to not control, after all he was the third most generously compensated CEO in the America; he must do it right. 2. Clarify how Aaron Beam may have utilized the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† to guard his activities. Do you feel that Aaron Beam’s circumstance the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† may have been substantial ? Clarify. Under the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument† Aaron Beam’s protection would be that Scrushy had requested him to control the bookkeeping records or all the more explicitly the general records. He was viewed as hesitant to consent, yet was constrained by Scrushy and somewhat scared by him to the point on occasion of dread. I don't trust Aaron Beam could have really utilized the â€Å"loyal agent’s argument†. The data shows Scrushy and Beam knew as expressed in Velasquez (2012), â€Å"From the start Scrushy and Beam both realized the organization needed to seem gainful to fulfill financial specialists and loan specialists and to later prevail with regards to giving and selling organization stock to the public† (page 68). Subsequently, Beam needed to know Scrushy would ask or requesting him to get it going. In light of Beam’s reluctances, it could be contended he realized that this generally will not be right however did it in any case. 3. Regarding Kohlberg’s sees on moral turn of events, at what phase of good advancement would you place Aaron Beam? Clarify. At what stage would you place Richard Scrushy? As far as Kohlberg’s sees I trust Aaron Beam’s moral advancement would be a Level Two Stage Three. My judicious for this is he knows good and bad both expectedly and what the law says. He shows this by his underlying hesitance to help Scruchy’s ch oice to control the general records. He likewise is in wonderment of Scruchy, and seems to need to satisfy him as an individual in power, and demonstrates his unwaveringness to after all Scruchy picked Beam to begin the organization with. As far as Kohlberg’s sees I trust Richard Scruchy’s moral improvement would be a Level One Stage Two. My balanced for this is it is about him; he is narcissistic and takes a gander at things just from his own perspective. To help this we just need to take a gander at his way of life, he has been hitched multiple times, lives lavishly, while beneficent it shows up he tossed cash around for self-acknowledgment. The delights he gains by the entirety of this gives him motivation to accept he is directly as far as he could tell. To help this further his own representatives depict him as a tyrant, religion like figure, and an incredible helper. This would show he was ingenious in getting what he needed by whatever methods available, much like a ruined youngster. Reference Velasquez, M. G. (2012). Business morals, ideas and cases. (seventh ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.